Not long ago, the New York Times, the nation's most left-leaning and anti-American daily newspaper, wa outraged over the release of the name of a nominal CIA agent. They demanded an investigation, hearings, judges, lawyers, and a perp walk for the perpetrator. Of course, when it came to light that it was Richard Armitage that actually released the name, they backed way off that demand. No, only the man whose recollection different from that of reporters -- Scooter Libby -- saw his name and reputation destroyed in a McCarthyite witch-hunt of questionable legality and import.
Fast forward to 2008, when the New York Times deliberately and with malice aforethought performs another "Armitage" -- this time releasing the name of an actual CIA agent who performed the interrogations of the Khalid Sheikh Mohammed -- and all we see is what ratfucking, worthless "journalists" the New York Times really employ.