ideas to spur a new birth of freedom and the death of liberal fascism! DotNetNuke Powered!Powered by DotNetNuke! View Tim Patterson's profile on LinkedIn
13

As I documented in my post Tax Code and Social Dysfunction = Bad News,  in 2009, just about 47 million filers will not pay income tax.  By "not pay", I do not mean "will be exempt from withholding".  By "not pay", I mean that these tax filers will be due refunds from the Federal Government that will be paid out long after those taxes were paid.  Which raises the question: if they won't owe the tax in the first place, why are we witholding it?

The withholding system in this nation is criminal. 

The Federal Government forces employers to withhold estimated income tax from every single paycheck issued to every single W-2 employee.  This "estimate" is based on what their tax rate would be if that single paycheck was their payrate across an entire year.  So, if you are an hourly employee whose wages may vary from pay period to pay period, your witholding is never exact.  Or if you were an employee subject to bonuses, your tax withholding for a bonus check could be truly whacky for just one week.  I remember the first bonus check I ever got -- the bonus itself was about 15% of my total annual salary (hey, I had good year) -- and as a result, the tax rate was the highest possible on that one check.

Couple that with the fact that the Federal Government varies the tax withholding guidelines from year to year (withholding will be higher in an election year than a non-election year, to provide for greater refunds in an election year than a non-election year), and pretty soon, you can see how the IRS and Congress team up to really bend the taxpayer over the table.  It's no coincidence that tax day is typically 198 days from Election Day in America.  No politician would ever want to move it closer.

Meanwhile, the Federal Government is holding your payments AND NOT PAYING INTEREST. Here's the real evil:  if you withold paying taxes due, even for one day, YOU pay INTEREST and PENALTIES.  Got to like how that works, don't you.  Understand why I have about as much respect for Congress and the IRS as I do pedophiles?

So, why don't we devise a tax plan that actually really does help tax filers in this country -- including ones that owe taxes and those that won't.  Let's make it simple, easy to understand, and most of all -- beneficial to taxpayers and not the government.  There is nothing more corrupt, more totalitarian, more confiscatory, and more criminal than a tax scheme that takes money not owed, pays no interest, and returns it months later without so much as a thank you.

So here is my proposal:

1)  Establish a new baseline standard deduction per taxpayer of $25,000 per year.  No income tax will be withheld on the first $25,000 of income per taxpayer, regardless of income level.

2) No income tax will be withheld until a taxpayer's salary exceeds $24,999.  Note that this may complicate matters for taxpayers who work several jobs, all of which earn below that threshold.  Taxpayers in this situation will probably have to adjust their withholding later in the year, or end up paying taxes later.  But I feel that will be a phenomenally small number of people.

3) Remove the underpayment penalty.  This penalty is assessed against taxpayers who fail to have enough money withheld.  It's a stupid rule given the fact that employers control withholding, not employees.

4) The dependent child deduction would be raised to $10,000 per dependent child for a child to age 17.  For a dependent child age 18-22 (ie, a college student), the deduction would drop to $7000, provided that the taxpayer is providing health insurance for the student.

5) Flatten the tax structure to two rates:  15% for taxpayers making between $25,000 and $99,999, and 30% for $100,000 and above.

7) Eliminate most other deductions, rebates, and credits.  Yes, this will probably put a larger number of tax attorneys and CPAs on the street, but the simple fact of the matter is that deductions, rebates, and credits that are applied after effect and not paid until well AFTER the taxes are paid do not help anyone.

What do you think?

 

Posted in: Tax Policy

Post Rating

Comments

Saturday, November 15, 2008 11:21 PM
It's a start, although I still prefer a consumption tax.

My memory is a little foggy on the subject, but I seem to recall that backup withholding was begun during World War II as a method to insure the federal government had a steady supply of funding for the war effort, instead of one big burst in the spring.

As is often the case with "temporary" measures, if the government likes them they become permanent. I think we all should have to write a check to the government on a quarterly basis, mainly because it keeps the IRS fresh on one's mind at election time.

In this case, I think you're right about the April 15th tax deadline being set far enough from the election intentionally. But if you're going to have an income tax, I want one flat rate for all. Your taxes shouldn't double if you get a promotion which takes you from $90k to $100k.

Post Comment

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website


ideas to spur a new birth of freedom and the death of liberal fascism!
IMPORTANT NOTICE

As a result of recent legal threats thrown at Maryland Bloggers by certain individuals with little respect for the law or our rights, I have modified the Terms and Conditions of this site.  You should make sure you review them at your earliest convenience.






Disclaimer

The information presented on this site represents the opinion of the poster, and are protected speech under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America and the Maryland Declaration of Rights. 

Complaints can be directed to blog@gunpowderchronicle.com.

 



I Recommend...


© 2006-2008 Gunpowder Chronicle and Tim Patterson. All Rights Reserved. | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement | Login