ideas to spur a new birth of freedom and the death of liberal fascism! DotNetNuke Powered!Powered by DotNetNuke! View Tim Patterson's profile on LinkedIn
29

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who heads a House of Representatives facing a 9% approval rating -- even lower than the President -- has blown it big time.  She wasn't able to deliver 40% of her own party in a vote that she and others had tried to portray as the absolute most important vote in sixty years.

Whoops.  And she did it by getting seriously bitchy, and turing the vote into a partisan catfight.

“It is a number that is staggering, but tells us only the costs of the Bush Administration’s failed economic policies—policies built on budgetary recklessness, on an anything goes mentality, with no regulation, no supervision, and no discipline in the system."

First, I am no fan of W's budgetary approach.  But, let us keep in mind that Nancy Pelosi is not just a bitch, but a dumb bitch, for she forgets that all spending bills MUST originate in her own House of Representatives.  That's right.  If the House of Representatives wants to stop budgetary recklessness, they should stop their own crap first.

Second, on the "anything goes" mentality, let's keep in mind that it was DEMOCRAT appointees to Fannie Mae that drove that bus over the cliff.  Franklin Raines -- OMB Chief under Billy Bob Clinton.  Jim Johnson -- money man for Billy Bob Clinton.  Jaimie Gorelick -- DOJ attorney and author of the famous "wall" that blocked cooperation between the CIA and the FBI that directly led to 9/11.  All three of them were NOTORIOUSLY GUILTY of falsifying accounting statements in order to inflate their own bonuses.

Third, on the "no regulation", well, Nancy Nobrains needs to watch that.  The US Congress passed some of the most far-reaching regulation in the history of the marketplace with Sarbanes-Oxley, which was supposed to cure this issue of falsifying accounting statements (hmm....).  But, as I wrote here, SARBOX was a failure there.  And, it also introduced the mark-to-market rule, which is currently driving this credit crisis.  I believe Nancy Nobrains voted for SARBOX.  The problem wasn't a lack of regulation or regulators -- it was a lack of goddamed common sense on the part of our political leaders who openly encouraged people to take out mortgages likey they were opening a new credit card.

Fourth, as for no discipline in the system, you need to look to your own house there, honeypants.  You should be bitchslapping Barney "Pillow Biter" Frank, who -- in collusion with Chris "Countrywide VIP" Dodd -- explicitly worked to block and obstruct any oversight into the corruption that those Clintoncrats were perpetuating at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Of course, Nancy Nobrains went on.  Presiding over the worst D'Alessandro disaster since Tommy III had to ask the Spiro Agnew to order the National Guard to Western High to keep the white crackers in Hamden during the '68 riots, she declared:

"I must recognize the outstanding leadership provided by Chairman Barney Frank, whose enormous intellectual and strategic abilities have never before been so urgently needed, or so widely admired."

Say what?  Is the Dego off her Pasta?  Barney "Pillow Biter" Frank is a key cause of this problem.  His complete obstruction into investigating and dealing with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- even going so far just last year to proclaim "there are no problems" was a leading cause of this manufactured crisis.

Is this bitch crazy or what?

I am glad this bill went down in flames.  Nancy Nobrains only needed to hold 218 Democrats out of her 235 total.  She could afford to lose 17.  She got 65 more votes from the GOP... but in the end SHE LOST 90 DEMOCRATS ON THIS BILL.  That is a failure of CATASTROPHIC proportions for her leadership.  It's a leadership failure. It's a political failure.  It's abject failure.

And I am smiling.  Because a majority of Congress, especially those in risky seats, voted against this bill.  You know what that says?  It says that even Congress doesn't believe the dark scenarios coming out of GoldmanSachs alumns Hank Paulson, Josh Bolten, and Ben Bernanke.  It says that Congress can't justify a vote that bails out millionaires at the expense of the "forgotten man".

One of the lessons of a book called "The Forgotten Man" by Amity Schlaes is that the New Deal actually prolonged the Great Depression because of its war on business. 

But this is different.  This is a war on middle America by government bailing out businesses that were morally (and almost surely criminally) bankrupt.  It is the socialization of risk and the privatization of profit, where the taxpayer -- "The Forgotten Man" -- holds all the responsibilities and few of the benefits.  It is the implementation of Facism over freedom. 

If Congress were smart -- and with Nancy Nobrains in charge, that is NOT a safe bet -- they would go back to the drawing table and start with incremental, but useful changes.  Suspend the mark-to-market rules.  Authorize the SEC to immediately audit companies financial statement to understand how intertwined these finacial instruments (like credit default swaps) are.  Implement an insurance program, rather than an outright buyout.  Start with the worst-case companies first, and work backwards.  There is no reason to rush headlong into a problem we do not fully understand.

But that is wisdom beyond the years of a Speaker of the House who would rather be a bitch than a leader.

Post Rating

Comments

# idiot!
Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:49 AM
I read it was 60-40 Dems and 40-60 Reps. She is making a smart move insisting that this is a bi-partisan effort and not letting the Dems take all the chances in saving the economy. If they tried, they could have whipped more votes out of the caucus.

If anybody failed, it was Bush and McCain. Im trying to understand all of this, but from what I gather, the bill is necessary, and after the Dems stepped in to make sure this wasnt a blatant giveaway, a bill was created that both sides could agree with that provided oversight, help for people in default on their mortgage, and a good chance to make most of the $ back over time (hopefully).

Now with the Dem leadership on board and bringing the majority of their caucus, Bush on board, and the Repub leadership on board, and with McCain on board trying to be leader, the Republicans failed to deliver (or at least their leadership did). They didnt put the bill up to fail, Pelosi must have thought she had the votes. The Republican leadership (primarily McCain) failed to even convince their own party to support this compromise.

And enough of this Pelosi squawking to ruin the vote nonsense, bc with a bill as big as this, there is no chance that there were any congressmen there that hadnt already made up their mind. In my experience, everything that is said on the floor is planned and for show for the cameras.

Believe it or not, I am a balanced budget kind of guy and saves my ass off to hopefully one day live the American dream of owning a home and Im made about the people defaulting (had a very interesting convo with a banker about this that gave a lot of insight and left me feeling no pity for these people- but that is another long tangent) and def know love for the bankers who were thinking they could just repo these rapidly appreciating homes when the owner defaulted and sell the home again like a big Rent a Center for homes. All I know is that shit needs to be done to save the stock market and to prevent a flooding of homes on the market. And I guess that is why I am a dum libtard, bc as much as I would love a cheap home, I do not want it at the expense of the American economy. People smarter than myself are saying that this needs to be done, so lets quit the yes or no and figure out the how.
# Gunpowder Chronicle
Tuesday, September 30, 2008 7:37 AM
idiot!-- you miss one big point: the majority of Republicans were NEVER on board with this bill. Boehner even called it a crap sandwich while saying he would vote for it. Everyone knew this.

You can try to cover for her inept leadership all you want, but she had no choice but to deliver the majority of her caucus. She didn't.

As for the President and McCain failing-- I'd point you back to the immigration debacle. THEY are the ones who continually go off the reservation. THEY are the ones who are outside the mainstream of conservative thinking on how to attack this issue.

Given that even Ben Bernanke and Hank Paulson cannot possibly predict if this will work-- and they admit that -- it's a pretty damn big gamble if they are wrong. Remember when helping sell Bear Stearns was the firewall? Then the $300 billion mortgage bill? At each step, they have been demonstrably wrong.

This bill would have given the Secretary of the Treasury immense power with little or no accountability. IT was a bad bill. Maybe the cocksucking little trolls in Congress can come up with something better this time.
# idiot!
Tuesday, September 30, 2008 10:26 AM

Pelosi pulled 60% of the Dems to vote for this bill. That’s a majority any way you slice it. And if you look at the list of Dems voting no, there are some glaringly “safe” Dems and the moderate rank and file. There were a majority of the Dems that could easily have voted for this with no backlash, and Im sure they could have whipped more to vote- but why? Why let the Democratic party take on the full responsibility for a bill that is a tough pill to swallow?

Meanwhile, you may have finally jumped off the Bush/McCain train, but they are by tradition, the de facto leaders of the party. Assuming a bailout of some order is necessary, they need to be backing the correct one that is in line with their party and they need to LEAD and organize/galvanize support.

That leads us to the discussion of bailout, which is admittedly above my pay grade. Not being an economist, I have to take the experts word that this is truly a crisis that cannot be ignored. I then have to trust that with both parties having a say in the matter, they could come up with the best bill possible.

The economy is in the shit, my parents have lost a couple of luxury cars in the stock market and I know a couple of my friends’ parents have lost a couple of luxury houses (all republicans). Why are we letting Republican congressmen (and lets be honest, they mostly represent poor people who could care less about the stock market and probably only have like 3 shares of Apple stock they got for Christmas 4 years ago) derail a bill that is looking to save the economy just so they can come off looking “fiscally conservative”. $700 billion is a lot and it sucks that none of it is going towards me. It sucks that I care about my credit and make fiscally prudent decisions while those around me, rich and poor, make gambles with no real consequences. But its not about me, its about the country and the economy, which for all intents and purposes is on the ropes.

But that is a debate about the merits of the bailout, more on point, you are incorrect that Pelosi didn’t pull her share. She pulled 60% (with many more votes that can be pulled if she really wanted this to pass) but the Republican leadership failed. If they thought it was a bad bill, they shouldn’t have supported it, but they did, so one can only assume it was a workable compromise. The right answer is somewhere in between the two parties stances and active engagement is needed from both sides- not just one side doing the work while the other criticizes. They failed to deliver, and more importantly they were exposed as bad leaders. McCain failed.
# FF
Tuesday, September 30, 2008 1:02 PM
Duh! Pelosi DID deliver the majority of her party! What kind of math are you doing, Gunpowder? Your guy McCain, who supposedly suspended his campaign to personally see that this bill passed failed, not Pelosi. And by the way, calling her a "bitch" really shows where you are coming from. Threatened by women in power? By all means, then, vote for McCain/Palin. Palin being one heartbeat away from the presidency ought to scare the crap out of you, because she is not smart, has no self-awareness to understand that she is not ready to be president of the United States, and yet likes to micromanage. Awesome presidential material.

Post Comment

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website


ideas to spur a new birth of freedom and the death of liberal fascism!
IMPORTANT NOTICE

As a result of recent legal threats thrown at Maryland Bloggers by certain individuals with little respect for the law or our rights, I have modified the Terms and Conditions of this site.  You should make sure you review them at your earliest convenience.






Disclaimer

The information presented on this site represents the opinion of the poster, and are protected speech under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America and the Maryland Declaration of Rights. 

Complaints can be directed to blog@gunpowderchronicle.com.

 



I Recommend...


© 2006-2008 Gunpowder Chronicle and Tim Patterson. All Rights Reserved. | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement | Login