Sunday, September 30, 2007 5:15 PM
"Treat marriage as a simple social contract. Stop pretending that government has a role in something that is principally a religious or cultural ceremony."
Marriage is a cornerstone to family and society. Marriage should not be belittled as you have done in your post.
Government consists of leaders of the community who oversee the community's health and well being. To think that leadership should not promote healthy marriages between a man and a woman and promote the importance of families is absurd.
"Several years I went to a wedding for a cousin. ...Thirteen months later, they were divorced. Nice obedience to the vows.
...So my solution is this: the government should get out of marriage altogether."
Gunpowder, this line of argument is terrible and I believe I have addressed it before, for you particularly:
The perverters of what is good and reasonable to hold dear in our hearts do not ruin the greater rule that man and woman respectfully together with child is the correction to our rebellious natures.
Your argument and many like it are basically saying that because people can violate a good principle that the principle is somehow diminished as a result. People can choose to violate good principles but they are still accountable to those same good principles and their irreducibility.
"No-fault divorce gives carte blanche to the wandering eye."
Then the solution is not to scrap the institution of marriage and regard it as a useless vestige. The solution to your point is to bring back proof of fault divorce. Just because the court system was turned into a circus because of fault divorce does not mean the requirement was without merit.
Incidentally, Gunpowder, what is going on with your website design? It has gone from bad to better and now worse. I say worse because a man should always learn from his mistakes and not go backwards, as it were.
That "GC" in your header looks like some kind of gang tag on the side of a building.