Current Posts | Blog Categories | Search Blog | RSS Feeds
posted by Gunpowder Chronicle on Monday, May 28 2007 @ 1:30 PM
Comments: 1
Rating:
Viewed: 158 times.
Print

What is City Councilwoman and Ex-City Council President Mary Pat Clarke thinking?  She wants to do away with the "corner store" in Baltimore City according to the Calvert Street Communist Party Newsletter.

It just goes to show you that even recycled politicians are nothing more than recycled ass clowns.

One of the keys to urban re-development -- as any local planning specialist will tell you -- is a robust combination of retail, services, and and residential together in tightly-knit communities. Typically, you will see an arrangement of "Retail on the first floor, services on the second floor, and residential on the third floor".

Why is this?

Well, ground level locations suck for residences.  Period.  Ever wonder why all the rowhomes in Baltimore are famous for their stoops?  Because the living quarters aren't located right on ground level. You provide separation from the street and a degree of privacy not available in a ground floor arrangement.

Second, in the "good old days" -- when Baltimore was a hot and rocking city -- many times those second and third floor were occupied by the family that owned or operated the retail space on the ground floor.  Nice combination.

More importantly, though, when you have a robust combination of "heads and beads", you have robust communities that are self-sustaining.  People don't need to hop in to the car just to hit the grocery store for a pack of diapers.  The neighborhood is "self-patrolling", because there is always someone there.  When everyone heads of to work, there are local businesses that "keep an eye out" and at night, the families do the same for the businesses.  Those same businesses are also little economic engines for the communities, providing jobs -- especially entry-level ones for teenagers -- that are sorely needed.  Even beyond that, the businesses and services become involved in the life of the community, providing support for festivals, charitable causes, etc.  Trust me-- the mom and pop bodega on the corner of Aliceanna and Thames is more likely to do that than the Walmart in Locust Point.

What really strikes me odd about this, is that it flies directly into the face of the great success stories of Baltimore's renaissance.  When you look at the communities that have really come back in the last decade -- Fells Point, Canton, Brewer's Hill, Butcher's Hill, Federal Hill-- they ALL feature this robust mix.  Hampden -- that hallmark of inner city redneck turned Birkenstock-wearing, tye-dye hippy chic -- never lost it, and that is why it survived.

You would think that a politician who was around at the earliest beginnings of that renaissance would get that.

Apparently not, as she is too busy applying clown makeup to her bum.

This article tagged under: Maryland Politics

Rate this post:
By Free Lander @ Tuesday, May 29, 2007 10:07 AM
Clarke's point seems to be that there are no Mom & Pop stores going into these spaces - only businesses of questionable value to the community, so the whole city needs to suffer as a result. A heavy-handed approach to be sure.
I notice from the article that some are encouraged to keep their first floors vacant in order to maintain the zoning that would allow a business if one does not currently exist. Any policy that encourages speculation and vacancy in the prospect of some future gain is detrimental to the health of the community. This is the same sort of policy that keeps whole neighborhoods in ruins as they await gentrification at some nebulous date in the future. This same practice encourages sprawl as farmers are encouraged to sell their low-tax land for development, which we allow by right.
If the land use and land tax relationship were more tightly bound, all land would be taxed based on it's best and highest use and any other use would be prohibited. This would eliminate the speculative (and most destructive IMO) aspect of land use and ensure that no land intended for a use other than its current one would sit idle, as its owner would be taxed on the declared use.
More than zoning, environmental and other politically charged means, this alone would eliminate many of the development issues both urban and rural, that have turned our metro areas into what James Howard Kunstler calls "Clusterf--k Nation."
Click here to post a comment
I Recommend...


Obama -- Putting the O in Moron

Tag Cloud
Archive by Month
Blog Roll
IMPORTANT NOTICE

As a result of recent legal threats thrown at Maryland Bloggers by certain individuals with little respect for the law or our rights, I have modified the Terms and Conditions of this site.  You should make sure you review them at your earliest convenience.

Disclaimer

The information presented on this site represents the opinion of the poster, and are protected speech under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America and the Maryland Declaration of Rights. 

Complaints can be directed to blog@gunpowderchronicle.com.

 

© 2006-2008 Gunpowder Chronicle and Tim Patterson. All Rights Reserved. | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement | Login